REAL WORLD EXIT SITE CARE AND RISK OF INFECTION IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS AT WESTERN RENAL SERVICES

Mr Jadon Ryan Yang1, Ms MARIA DARAOAY2, Associate Professor LUKAS KAIRAITIS1,2, Dr JOHN WING LI1,2, Associate Professor KAMAL SUD3,4, Dr KATRINA CHAU1,2

1School of Medicine, Western Sydney University , Campbelltown, Australia, 2Regional Dialysis Centre, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, Australia, 3Nepean Kidney Research Centre, Department of Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Australia, 4Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Kingswood, Australia

Biography:

Jadon is a 5th year medical student at Western Sydney University who has a special interest in nephrology.

Aim:

To assess the impact of exit-site care practices, including type of antiseptic use, on infection rates in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Background:

Catheter related infections (CRIs) can lead to severe complications such as peritonitis and catheter removal. Adherence to guidelines and its impact on infection rates remain unclear.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among prevalent PD patients at Western Renal Services during routine clinic visits. The local exit-site care policy recommends the use of povidone-iodine for the first 6-8 weeks, and either povidone-iodine or Medihoney thereafter. Participants provided information on exit-site care practices and adherence to training instructions. Clinical data on CRIs and peritonitis were retrieved from electronic medical records. Chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction were used to compare infection rates.

Results:

Fifty-six patients on PD were surveyed, with a mean dialysis vintage of 825 days (SD=775). Of these, 27 (48%) had diabetes and 12 (21%) had coronary artery disease (CAD). Thirty-three (59%) patients used povidone-iodine, 7 (12.5%) used Medihoney, 14 (25%) used both, and 2 patients used neither. All patients used either saline or soap and water. There was no significant difference in infection rates among these groups after Bonferroni correction (p>0.0063). However, patients with CAD exhibited higher rates of peritonitis (p=0.02). Adherence to prescribed exit-site care was inconsistent, with 28 patients deviating from initial instructions; however, there was no statistically significant difference in CRIs (p=0.5) or peritonitis rates (p=0.5) between adherent and non-adherent patients. Eleven patients reported CRIs not documented in the medical records.

Conclusions:

Type of antiseptic use and adherence to exit-site care practices did not significantly impact CRI rates. However, CAD was associated with higher risk of peritonitis.

 

 

Categories